DBCP Facts
This page serves as a resource for accurate factual information related to cases concerning the agricultural chemical DBCP and Dole’s firm commitment to the safety and well being of our employees.
Dole is dedicated to constant improvements in the health and safety of our 75,000 employees worldwide. Dole sets high standards for the Company that go beyond what the law requires. Our people are our greatest asset and their safety and well being our highest priority.
LATEST NEWSWESTLAKE VILLAGE, Calif. – July 15, 2010 – Dole Food Company, Inc. today announced that the Los Angeles Superior Court dismissed Tellez v. Dole, the last remaining lawsuit brought by Nicaraguan plaintiffs claiming to have been banana workers on Dole-contracted farms in Nicaragua during the 1970s. The dismissal came as a result of the Court's finding that plaintiffs and their representatives engaged in "blatant fraud, witness tampering, and active manipulation."
In dismissing this lawsuit, the Court vacated the earlier $1.58 million judgment against Dole in favor of four of the 12 plaintiffs claiming sterility from DBCP exposure while allegedly working on Dole-contracted farms.
This result was the culmination of hearings conducted by the Court in response to the July 7, 2009 order issued to plaintiffs by the California Second District Court of Appeal directing them to show cause why this $1.58 million judgment should not be vacated and judgment be entered in Dole's favor on the grounds that the judgment was procured through fraud.
Issuing her ruling in court today, Justice Victoria Chaney stated that plaintiffs did not devise this fraud on their own. "It is not reasonable to conclude that 14,000" claimants were made sterile by DBCP. "Some or all of the claimants have brought fraudulent claims." The Court explained that there had to be – and found that there was – a coordinated effort "to bring fraudulent claims to our courts" by plaintiffs' attorneys. Los Angeles attorney Juan Dominguez "was and is actively involved in activating and perpetuating this fraud and scheme on the Court", ruled Justice Chaney.
Justice Chaney also dismissed plaintiffs' contention that Dole bribed several witnesses, adding that "this Court is not persuaded."
"Today's dismissal finally brings closure to these fraudulent Nicaraguan claims. They all lacked any semblance of credibility," said C. Michael Carter, Dole's Executive Vice President and General Counsel. "These claims are a fraud on the California courts and never should have been brought in the first place," Carter added.
Finding clear and convincing evidence of fraud, the Court not only found that plaintiffs' witnesses corroborated the fraud and witness tampering, but also quoted a plaintiff who testified that he was "coached to answer questions like a parrot" while at the Nicaraguan office of plaintiffs' attorneys.
Justice Chaney noted, however, that threats and intimidation by plaintiffs' agents "significantly interfered" with Dole's ability to uncover that fraud either before or during the Tellez trial. The testimony of several witnesses who were willing to eventually come forward, and whose testimony the Court cited as credible, helped uncover the fraud.
Throughout the hearing, Dole has asked the Los Angeles Superior Court to take actions to protect those brave Nicaraguan witnesses who came forward to expose the massive fraud on the Court perpetrated by Dominguez and his Nicaraguan associate, Antonio Hernandez Ordeñana. "The brave and courageous individuals who chose to step forward in this case to tell the truth and expose this blatant fraud on the court deserve continued protection from this outrageous harassment," said Carter.
Previous attempts by plaintiffs to enforce Nicaragua judgments have also been dismissed. Most recently on October 20, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida denied recognition and enforcement of a $98.5 million Nicaragua judgment, finding that "the credible and unrefuted medical testimony in this case is that it is factually impossible for what is represented in the Judgment to have occurred," and that due process "do[es] not permit awarding damages in the face of clear scientific evidence of the absence of causation … ."
In that case, Judge Paul C. Huck further found that "[t]he evidence before the Court is that the judgment … arose out of proceedings that the Nicaraguan trial court did not have jurisdiction to conduct … . During those proceedings, the court applied a law that unfairly discriminates against a handful of foreign defendants with extraordinary procedures and presumptions found nowhere else in Nicaraguan law. Both the substantive law under which this case was tried, Special Law 364, and the Judgment itself, purport to establish facts that do not, and cannot, exist in reality. As a result, the law under which this case was tried stripped Defendants of their basic right in any adversarial proceeding to produce evidence in their favor and rebut the plaintiffs' claims."
Justice Chaney found that Nicaragua's judicial system "is, at best, fragile in its ability to present consistent rule of law and outcomes." She further found that, while many Nicaraguans live in relative poverty and with limited economic opportunity, [t]his lawsuit is not the appropriate vehicle to rectify this situation," adding that "[c]ivil actions are sometimes brought to induce social change. This is neither the platform nor the time to discuss using the court system to bring about different policies that affect society in general."
"While Dole believes there is no reliable scientific basis for alleged injuries from the agricultural field application of DBCP," said Carter, "Dole continues to seek reasonable resolution of pending litigation and claims in the U.S and Latin America." As in Honduras, Dole is committed to finding a prompt resolution to the DBCP claims in Nicaragua, and is prepared to pursue a structured worker program in Nicaragua with science-based criteria.
Dole is the world's largest producer and marketer of high-quality fresh fruit and fresh vegetables, and is the leading producer of organic bananas. Dole markets a growing line of packaged and frozen foods and is a produce industry leader in nutrition education and research.
This release contains "forward-looking statements," within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Forward looking statements, which are based on management's current expectations, are generally identifiable by the use of terms such as "may," "will," "expects," "believes," "intends," "anticipates" and similar expressions. The potential risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied herein include weather-related phenomena; market responses to industry volume pressures; product and raw materials supplies and pricing; energy supply and pricing; changes in interest and currency exchange rates; economic crises and security risks in developing countries; international conflict; and quotas, tariffs and other governmental actions. Further information on the factors that could affect Dole's financial results is included in its SEC filings, including its Annual Report on Form 10-K.
DOLE PRESS RELEASES
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC. ASKS LOS ANGELES COURT TO PROTECT NICARAGUAN WITNESSES June 10, 2010 LAWSUITS AGAINST DOLE BY IVORY COAST PLAINTIFFS DISMISSED November 16, 2009 U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN MIAMI RULES IN FAVOR OF DOLE AND REJECTS NICARAGUA JUDGMENT October 26, 2009
Dole Vindicated by Court’s Formal Findings of Fraud and Corruption by Nicaraguan Plaintiffs Claiming Injury By DBCP and Their Lawyers June 18, 2009 – 116 k PDF
Dole statement on dismissal of two DBCP lawsuits in LA County Superior Court April 24, 2009 – 59 k PDF
Dole Food Company, Inc. Wins Court Rulings March 10, 2008 – 60 k PDF
DBCP Press Release November 5, 2007 – 120 k PDF
COURT RULINGS
U.S. District Court in Miami Rules in Favor of Dole and Rejects Nicaragua Judgment October 26, 2009 – 41 k PDF
U.S. District Court Judge Paul C. Huck ruling denying enforcement of Osorio judgment October 20, 2009 – 295 k PDF
California Court of Appeals remands Tellez to trial court July 7, 2009 – 67 k PDF
Judge Victoria G. Chaney ruling on Mejia and Rivera cases for fraud on the court June 17, 2009 – 2.2M PDF
Judge Victoria G. Chaney ruling on plaintiffs’ conspiracy of fraud and extortion against Dole April 23, 2009 – 88 k PDF
DOLE'S RESPONSE TO THE FILM BANANAS!*
Banana Movie Press Release Withdraw FINAL Oct. 14, 2009 – 16 kb PDF
Dole Opposition to Defendant's Special Motion Oct. 6, 2009 – 2.07 Mb PDF
Declaration of David Ginsburg Oct. 6, 2009 – 1.7 Mb PDF
Declaration of Marc Schenker Oct. 6, 2009 – 809 kb PDF
Declaration of Arnold Schwartzman Oct. 6, 2009 – 43 k PDF
Declaration of Jeffrey Todd Oct. 6, 2009 – 654 k PDF
Declaration of Scott Edelman Oct. 6, 2009 – 1.76 Mb PDF
Dole Statement on the Film "Bananas!*" Sept. 23, 2009 – 42 k PDF
The Facts About "Bananas!*" Sept. 28, 2009 – 176 k PDF
Dole Letter to Swedish MPs Mats Johansson and Luciano Astudillo Sept. 28, 2009 - 432 k PDF
Defamation Complaint July 8, 2009 – 2.2 M PDF
Letter to Fredrik Gertten June 23, 2009 – 464 k PDF
NEWS COVERAGE
Dole Urges Swift End of Case to Protect Witnesses By: Linda Deutsch Associated Press June 10, 2010
California judge in banana workers case against Dole says she, others threatened By: ANTHONY McCARTNEY Associated Press June 10, 2010
Judge can't enforce $97M judgement against Dole By: Jennifer Kay Associated Press October 21, 2009
Dole Doesn’t Have to Pay Nicaraguan Verdict, U.S. Judge Rules By: Edvard Pettersson Bloomberg October 21, 2009
Dole on a Roll: Court Declines to Enforce $97M Judgment By: Ashby Jones Wall Street Journal Law Blog October 21, 2009
Fraud by trial lawyers taints wave of pesticide lawsuits By: Steve Stecklow The Wall Street Journal August 19, 2009
Jackpot Justice Goes Global By: Vince Vitkowsky Real Clear Markets August 5, 2009
L.A. lawyer accused of fraud in pesticide litigation By: Alan Zarembo and Victoria Kim Los Angeles Times August 5, 2009
Journalistic documentary? (note: link opens to Google Translate version of original Swedish) By: Jonas Deveborn Kristianstadsbladet August 1, 2009
US lawyer faces investigation after battling corporations on workers’ behalf By: Rory Carroll The Guardian July 15, 2009
Trial lawyer tactics exposed in Latin America By: Former Ambassador Roger F. Noriega The American July 14, 2009
Pesticide cases could be upended By: Victoria Kim and Alan Zarembo Los Angeles Times July 12, 2009
A bunch of fake claims against Dole? By: Michael Orey BusinessWeek July 6, 2009
U.S. imports of lawsuits rising By: Ronald D. Rotunda Orange County Register June 30, 2009
Dole Uses Judge Attack in Banana Case to Undo $2 Billion Awards By: Edvard Pettersson Bloomberg.com June 24, 2009
Dole Claims Bananas! Film Documents Fraud By: Michael Orey Business Week June 19, 2009
Attorneys made fraudulent claims in Dole suits, judge rules By: Victoria Kim Los Angeles Times June 18, 2009
Hearing set for lawyer accused of extorting Dole By: Linda Deutsch Associated Press June 17, 2009
Fraud on Dole detailed By: Mark Lackter LA Biz Observed June 17, 2009
The Big Slip Up By: Alexa Hyland Los Angeles Business Journal June 8, 2009
'A Blatant Extortion': A judge slams plaintiffs lawyers' torts-for-import game By: Editorial Staff The Wall Street Journal May 13, 2009
Lawyer faces contempt charges in pesticide case against Dole By: Carol J. Williams The Los Angeles Times May 9, 2009
Judge refers lawyer for prosecution in Dole fraud By: Linda Deutsch Associated Press May 9, 2009
A Dole-ful victory Editorial Investor’s Business Daily
LA judge rules fraud in suits against Dole By: Linda Deutsch Associated Press April 23, 2009
Dole claims fraud in Nicaragua banana worker suits By: Linda Deutsch Associated Press April 21, 2009
Judge could toss Dole pesticide cases By: Gina Keating Reuters April 21, 2009
Cases on Behalf of Foreign Nationals Are Out of Order By: C. Michael Carter, executive vice president, general counsel and corporate secretary of Dole Food Co. Inc. Ventura County Star October 23, 2007
Lawyers Without Borders Wall Street Journal August 21, 2007; Page A14
DOLE’S GLOBAL COMMITMENT TO CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Dole is committed to the quality of our products, sustainable environmental practices and the wellbeing of our 75,000 employees worldwide. Dole contributes generously to the communities where it operates around the world, promoting nutrition and health education as well as a healthier, more sustainable environment. Visit: http://dole.com/corporateresponsibility/ to learn more. |